How do the visual elements persuade the viewer to think or act in a certain way? Give specific examples of visual elements in the visual. Are the elements effective considering the Rhetorical Situation you have identified? Explain.

Discussion Board Posts Request (DB posts are blog type posts that students use to interact with one another, commenting on each others post). Word Count: at least 300-350 Citation and Style: APA ***One scripture reference is required*** ?Topic: Visual Analysis 1. Watch the video: Purdue OWL: Visual Rhetoric: https://youtu.be/-vJvivIzkDg 2. Review Textbook Chapter 4 (Section 2-a) Summary and Comparison of the Classical, Toulmin, and Rogerian Models in the Week 7 Reading and Study folder. 3. Review the visual (here): https://www.surfrider.org/currents/psa/rap-sushi 4. Analyze the effectiveness of the visual argument presented in the visual in a 300-350 word response containing the following information: Based on the video: Purdue OWL: Visual Rhetoric: Describe the Rhetorical Situation of the visual (purpose, audience, context). Are there ways that the visual elements could be presented differently for a better result? What aspects of the visual are most effective? Explain. Based on the Summary and Comparison of the Classical, Toulmin, and Rogerian Models: Which model do you think could best be supported with this visual? Give specific reasons to support your answer (i.e. use of appeals in Classical, use of claim, warrants, and backing in Toulmin, or the common ground in Rogerian). Complete your analysis with a summary of the effectiveness of the visual argument presented in the visual. Cite the visual according to your documentation style (APA). Textbook and video references below (one scripture reference is required) White, Fred D. and Simone J. Billings. The Well Crafted Argument. Custom ed., Cengage, 2017. Chapter 4 (Section 2-a) What goes in the Ocean goes in you: https://www.surfrider.org/currents/psa/rap-sushi
Hide

Develop a research question, and then in 6 pages, evaluate research literature associated with the question in terms of credibility, reliability, ethics, and value. Explain how the research can be used by psychology professionals.

Preparation In your role as a psychology professional, you have been asked to contribute to a professional association’s quarterly newsletter. You need to select a question, review the most recent research on the topic of your question, and discuss how the research can be applied to professional practice. To develop a research question, think about your areas of interest in psychology, things you are passionate about, and who your audience will be. What type of research question will help you expand your knowledge and skills while contributing to the field of psychology? Here are a few examples: What are the best practices for treating individuals of diverse cultural backgrounds? How does technology impact learning in the elementary school classroom? What might explain the increase in the number of children diagnosed with developmental disorders, such as autism and Asperger’s Syndrome? Is there a relationship between leadership and emotional intelligence? What role does birth order play in personality development? Once you have a research question, look for at least three peer-reviewed articles from scholarly journals relevant to your research question. Look for patterns, as well as different answers to your research question, and then narrow your findings down to about three main themes that will make up the body of your review of the literature. The final step will be to examine how you would apply the findings to your professional practice in psychology and what the findings mean to your area of specialization. Because this is an article for publication, be sure to format it according to APA guidelines. (You may wish to use the APA Paper Template in the Resources.) Requirements In the article you write for this assessment, include the following: Develop a research question to address a problem in the field of psychology. Evaluate the research literature in terms of reliability, credibility, ethics, and value. o Explain the assumptions and biases of the researchers. o What was the motive or reason that the research was conducted? o Does that affect the credibility or reliability of the findings? o Are there ethical issues within the research and were they addressed? o Compare the different research studies. o Did they use the same methods? o Did they have the same or similar conclusions? o Are there flaws in the research? o How well does the research answer the question you developed? Explain how you would apply the research to professional psychology practice. o How are the findings important for your area of psychology? Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Examples section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like. Additional Requirements Format: Include a title page and reference page. Length: 6 pages, double-spaced. References: At least three current scholarly or professional resources. APA formatting: References and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards. Font: Times New Roman, 12 points.
Hide

analytical argument in response to The Yellow Wallpaper (by Charlotte Perkins Gilman)in which literary criticism was integrated into the argument.

Its always best to figure out what you want to argue before looking at the literary criticism. Start by drafting your argumentative thesis. Then spend a bit of time locating articles of literary criticism that you think you could use in your argument about the short story. (If you get really stuck on a topic for an argument, you can browse the literary criticism to see what interpretations other critics have found worth arguing about.) Now draft a 750 1,000word (3-4typed, double-spaced pages) argument using a minimum of TWO piecesof literary criticism. You are, of course, free to use more here is a link to the story: you can also find short summeries of it online like clifnotes. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/theliteratureofprescription/exhibitionAssets/digitalDocs/The-Yellow-Wall-Paper.pdf

Describe what the compliance issue was and note any applicable laws that could apply to this case. (5 points)

Compliance Paper Assignment Last name: There are many compliance pitfalls an organization could fall into through the unscrupulous efforts of employees. For this assignment, you will pick one common compliance issue and more fully examine the topic. In completing this assignment, consider the information you gathered from your interview with the compliance officer interview. Review relevant information on the Health Care Compliance Association website. https://www.hcca-info.org/default.aspx The compliance issue I am further investigating for this class. You may choose one of the following topics: 1. Accepting vacations or gifts from a vendor such as a pharmaceutical sales person in exchange for buying that vendors products Write a two to three page paper detailing this compliance issue and how this type of compliance issue is identified. Discuss how a and what the outcome was following an investigation. 1. Begin the paper with an introduction. Introduce the compliance issue and an example of the issue. (2 points) 2. Provide the background of the situation that you chose. (5 points) 3. 4. Describe the possible outcome for the situation that you chose. (6 points) 5. Discuss what a compliance officer would need to do in such a situation. (5 points) 6. Provide a solid conclusion wrapping up the details of the case. (2 points)
Hide

The Romanesque Art and Architecture piece, the tympanum of the west portal of the cathedral of Saint-Lazare, the Last Judgment

select a method of interpretation, research the work of art, write a research paper. The paper must be 5 pages, typed (no larger than 12-point font and 1 margins), and double spaced. Chicago Style is the required for citations and the bibliography (7 sources minimum/your textbook and Oxford Art Online count as sources). You must use scholarly materials available in the library for your research paper. Blogs, Wikipedia and websites are not scholarly and are not acceptable forms of research. Please be sure to review the rubric for the research paper. Research Paper Rubric Research Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome length length 50.0 pts 5 pages or more 45.0 pts 4.75 pages 40.0 pts 4.5 pages 35.0 pts 4 pages and less 50.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome citations 50.0 pts Chicago Style bibliography and footnotes (higher points for accuracy) 40.0 pts Chicago Style bibliography and footnotes (higher points for accuracy) 30.0 pts Chicago Style bibliography and no footnotes (higher points for accuracy) 20.0 pts another style 50.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome research 50.0 pts 5-7 sources; 1 primary source (higher points for quality scholarship) 40.0 pts 5 sources (higher points for quality scholarship) 30.0 pts 4 sources (higher points for quality scholarship) 20.0 pts 3 sources (higher points for quality scholarship) 50.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome thesis 100.0 pts proves thesis through facts and your own original theories 85.0 pts proves thesis through facts and theories of other experts 75.0 pts argues thesis through theories of other experts 65.0 pts argues thesis through personal opinion 100.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome method of interpretation 50.0 pts uses a method of interpretation consistently throughout paper 40.0 pts uses a method of interpretation in most of the paper 30.0 pts uses a method of interpretation in a few parts of the paper 20.0 pts selects a method of interpretation and rarely uses it in a paper 50.0 pts Total Points: 300.0
Hide

Choose 1 health-care-related topical area or function of interest (e.g., quality improvement, health care systems of care), and combine this with 1 of the areas of prospective practice (e.g., community-based, not-for-profit, acute-care hospital, for-profit

There may be some confusion with the way they have the assignment description for the unit 1 individual project regarding the deliverable. The best and most clear way to approach it is to have a title and a reference slide and 6 content slides. Each content slide will cover one of the 6 articles you find in your research. The content slides should each have about 100 words describing the study in the article- what was studied, methods used, what was measured, results, etc. The reference slide will include the 6 references (full reference information) in APA format. Make sure that the articles you choose are actual research study articles. They will have sections that clearly address the research problem or issue, the methods, sample description, measurement/observation process, results, discussion/conclusion. As part of the unit 1 mini-lesson I visited the library site and did a quick example search and show a research study article. You may find it helpful to review it. Getting Started Choose 1 health-care-related topical area or function of interest (e.g., quality improvement, health care systems of care), and combine this with 1 of the areas of prospective practice (e.g., community-based, not-for-profit, acute-care hospital, for-profit urban hospital, public health facility). Using the AIU library, review 6 contemporary, research-based articles of interest that relate to your chosen topical area or function and area of prospective practice. Summarize the problems that the research articles are addressing. Identify whether the research is qualitative or quantitative or a mixed methodology. Assignment Details Create 1 PowerPoint slide that details your topic of interest and its tie-in to health care. Slides 24 should each represent 2 of the reviewed articles. Include the title, author, type of methodology (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method). The Speaker Notes area for each slide must highlight the problem statement of each article. All slides should be accompanied by speaker notes.

Is Streaming the Future of the Music Industry?

Imagine that you are running for a state office (e.g., governor, senator, or representative) and you have to prepare a position paper for a debate on controversial issues in the news.You will want your position paper to demonstrate critical thinking, sound logic, valid claims, personal passion, and credible support that is cited correctly because the paper will be provided to the news media before the debate and will be scrutinized by the media and reported on regarding these criteria. Your professor will serve as your close advisor whose job is to review the paper and provide feedback to you on the papers strengths and weaknesses. Introduce your position using a thesis statement in the first paragraph, including a quote, question, or statistic from your reliable sources and an overview of the main points you will cover. (Its important to grab the audiences interest and inform them of what the main and support points are.) Provide three or four (3-4) major points to support your thesis statement. (Put each major point in a separate paragraph.) Provide one (1) paragraph in which you identify and answer an expected argument against your view. Organized arguments and support for claims effectively. Demonstrate personal passion for your position and critical thinking with persuasive language, sound logic, valid claims, and credible support for the claims. Provide two to three (2-3) credible and reliable references (in addition to the text) about current events, which have been published in the last five (5) years and are cited correctly in the position paper. (Wikipedia is not an acceptable source.)
Hide

Evaluate the living situation. Is it a problem or potential problem? (living alone, with family or a facility) Is it a problem or a good fit? Are there safety issues or concerns?

Comprehensive Evaluation Guidelines Your scholarly paper is a comprehensive evaluation of an elderly client. You can select a client in any setting. This will be your scholarly paper for this class. It should be submitted in APA format. Your references should not be greater than 5 years old. You must use scholarly references. Throughout your paper you should consider age-related changes (physiological). Please do not write this paper as a health history as in health assessment classes this should be written as a narrative format. It is worth 15% of your grade Information to be included: 1. Give a brief history of the client, include the medical history, social history 2. Explain the individual’s acute or chronic medical issues. If the individual has an acute medical problem, explain how it is exacerbated by the aging process (physiologic age-related changes). If your client does not have any medical concerns discuss how they are maintaining their health. Use rearch to support your findings. 3. Review the medications that the individual is taking, including any over the counter drugs. Are any of these drugs a problem? Many medications are problems in the older adult. Explain the issues. 4. Explain the functional status? (ADL and IADL) What is their mobility and ability to perform everyday activity? If there are any issues or concerns, explain. 5. Look at the mental health and cognitive ability. Is there any impairment? Is there a concern and if so is it being addresses? Also consider their daily activities including social. 6. Explain. If you r client is from the hospital you should be considering their home situation. How will it be impacted due to the illness. 7. What are your recommendations to improve the quality of life for this individual. References Please use a minimum of 5 resources (textbooks may be used but are not considered as the 5 resources., no more than 5 years old. Make use of journals, that is where your most up-to-date information will be. The Comprehensive Evaluation in worth 15% of your total grade. When choosing an older adult (over 65 years of age), consider choosing a person you know in the community. Do not choose a nursing home patient or chronic renal failure, it is difficult to distinguish aging from disease process. Choose your person early on, that way as you go through the course you can look at the issues on one individual.Please kindly choose an adult who is 65 years old and just had a fall.
Hide

Should banks treat differently their clients when extending overdrafts and term loans to their customers on the basis of their legal status (e.g. natural persons and legal entities) or size (small business vs. large enterprise)?

And if this is the case, would such a distinction be justifiable? ii) Interest on term loans is charged on the whole amount of money borrowed and is calculated on a monthly basis whereas in the bank overdraft interest is charged on only the amount overdrawn on a daily basis. Do you personally think that it is reasonable and fair for banks to be allowed to calculate interest rate as described above? Is the bank client sufficiently protected in case the bank decides to overcharge them?

Write a one page executive summary that includes your company profile and goals. Write a one page exit strategy where you discuss two key factors you would consider when planning an exit strategy. Provide explanation to support your reasoning.

Write a one page executive summary that includes your company profile and goals. Write a one page exit strategy where you discuss two key factors you would consider when planning an exit strategy. Provide explanation to support your reasoning.